Ram Revilla should be 26 years old by now…

Born as Ramgen Jose Magsaysay Bautista to JoseRamon Revilla, Sr.Acuña Bautista and Genelyn Magsaysay on February 12, 1988. Click here to see Ram Revilla’s Biography and other details you may wish to find out. — He should be 26 years old today.
image

We wish we could say “Happy Birthday 26th Birthday to you, Ramgen!“… However we could not… As with obvious reasons that you’re not here with us, but we believe that you’re in a happy place with Jesus Christ. You are now, ever since, in the place of comfort. We miss you so much! We miss the “father and eldest brother figure” that you were.

Cheers to you as we bet you miss drinking your favorite Black Label. We miss drinking it with you.

As we always say, “You are gone, but never will be forgotten.


Here’s a short clip entitled “Remembering Ramgen Jose “Ram Revilla” Magsaysay Bautista”.

A tribute, share your memories of him!

image

Testimonial:
A tribute to a simple man with simple wishes. Who and what is Ram Revilla or simply Ramgen to you? Are you his friend? A fan? Share us your memories of him and make it part of this tribute! Send us your message and we will add your testimonial about him here.

How to send us a message? You can use the form at this page and in there you will see "Click here to submit your testimonial" below that page or you can use our "Contact Us" page or by sending us an email at admin@ramrevilla.net. Note: Negative comments will not be entertained especially if it contain libelous materials. Always be reminded of the word respect.

#Justice4Ramgen&hisFamily
#RJBautistaIsInnocent

Motion for Reconsideration: Justice shall be served! A Recap: From Oct. 31, 2011 to Present.


Note: Below, you will be able to download documents relating to the Ram Revilla Murder Case. This is just a reminder that some browsers doesn’t work with the download. Please use a different browser if it doesn’t work. Thank you! If not, you can use the Contact Us Page and message us so that we can specifically send you the document you want to download.

LAST SEPT. 4, 2013 the Judge ordered the DENIAL of the PETITION FOR BAIL filed by RJ BAUTISTA and other accused. Only one (1) of the accused has been granted bail and that is Roy Francis Tolisora, the alleged gun-man, whom he admitted in his affidavits that he was really a hired killer and suddenly just backed-out.

The Order dated Sept. 4, 2013 states:

x x x WHEREFORE, all the foregoing duly considered, this Court rules as follows: (a) find the evidence of guilt of accused RAMON JOSEPH BAUTISTA Y MAGSAYSAY, GLAIZA VISDA Y RIVERA alias GLAIZA VISTA, JAN NORWIN DELA CRUZ Y GENTELIZO alias TOTO, RYAN PASTERA Y MONTINOLA alias BRYAN, and MICHAEL JAY NARTEA Y CRUZ alias MICHAEL to be strong, accordingly, their petitions for bail are DENIED. (b) find the evidence of guilt of accused ROY FRANCIS TOLISORA y HERRERA alias KIKO to be not strong, the petition for bail for accused is GRANTED. The amount of bail for said accused is fixed in the amount of Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (Php200,000.00) for his provisional liberty. x x x

According to the Honorable Judge, the evidence against all the accused are STRONG which signifies the DENIAL of the BAIL. With all due respect, as always maintained, WE BEG TO DISAGREE. Click here to download the ORDER of the Judge dated Sept. 4, 2013.

On that Order, the Honorable Court relied on the thesis of Regalado that asserted that when the Prima facie evidence unexplained and uncontroverted is sufficient to maintain the proposition affirmed. The accused disagrees with the conclusion reached by the Court when it surmised that since the defense has not presented rebuttal evidence, then the prosecution’s evidence standing alone would merit the continued denial of bail. Such proposition is downright unfair, unjust and unwarranted considering that the evidence so far presented by the prosecution against the accused RAMON JOSEPH BAUTISTA Y MAGSAYSAY is so weak that his continued confinement would be a denial of his basic right guaranteed under the Constitution to be entitled to bail even for a capital offense when the evidence could not warrant further denial of bail.

With that, the defense has no other choice but to file a Motion for Reconsideration in connection with the denial of the Petition for Bail. Given that, only three (3) accused filed a Motion for Reconsideration: Ramon Joseph Bautista, Ryan Pastera and Glaiza Visda.

Motion for Reconsideration

The Motion for Reconsideration (MR) filed by RJ Bautista through his counsels explained that the evidence used against RJ Bautista is so weak that the continued denial of his bail would be against his basic right. Also, it is again reiterated that he was arrested illegally and therefore detained illegally that was discussed in his Motion to Quash.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the RJ Bautista’s Motion for Reconsideration document in connection with the denial to Bail.

Download the file above to see the Motion for Reconsideration document filed by Ramon Joseph (RJ) Magsaysay Bautista. Read the grounds that his lawyer(s) stated for the Honorable Judge to reconsider his decision.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the Prosecution’s Comment (Re: the Motion for Reconsideration) document in connection with the denial to Bail.

Download the file above to see the Prosecution’s Comment (Re: the Motion to Quash of the accused). Read the Prosecution’s comment and opposition to the Motion for Reconsiderations filed by the accused.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the RJ Bautista’s Reply (Re: the Prosecution’s Comment to the Motion for Reconsideration) document in connection with the denial to Bail.

Download the file above to see the Reply of RJ Bautista’s lawyer in regards to the COMMENT of the Prosecution.


Timeline of Events: From Oct. 31, 2011 to Present

Ramon Joseph Magsaysay Bautista was arrested last October 31, 2011 at 11:30pm or just three (3) days after the crime.

  • On that fateful night of October 31, 2011 while the accused was on board a motor vehicle together with his youngest (male) sibling and elder sister coming out of their Patriarchial house in Bacoor, Cavite coming from the wake of his brother RAMGEN MAGSAYSAY BAUTISTA, a group of men holding heavy firearms asked them to pull over.

  • They asked herein accused: “Bryan, Bryan, ikaw ba si Bryan?” Herein accused answered in the negative and gave his name. Suddenly, the other men opened the car’s back door where his youngest sibling was seated and two men poked the heavy firearms to his sibling and asked the same question if accused younger sibling is “Bryan” and accused younger brother managed to say he is not the Bryan that the men were looking for;
  • After a while, it turned out that the men looking for a certain Bryan were police officers and their leader who accused later knew was Major Torred, managed to call over the phone to speak with the accused half brother Sen. Bong Revilla, who gave instruction for the police to get the accused be directed to Paranaque Police Station just for some questioning while the two other police seated at the back seat still carrying a large firearm. Herein accused was able to talk to his brother Sen. Bong Revilla on the same cellular phone that the police used and informed him that the police is asking him to go with them to their office for questioning of which Senator Bong Revilla, told the accused to follow the police, and in spite of a fever at that time, accused with his other siblings went directly on convoy to the Paranaque Police Headquarters;
  • At the Paranaque City Police Headquarters, the Police officers sent the accused and siblings to an private air conditioned office and even bought medicine for the accused and Mc Donald’s burger at that time which the accused and siblings consumed while the Police Officers was happily conversing with them;
  • It was only when the accused biological mother arrived that the Police officers particularly Major Torred informed all of us that they are apprehending the accused as suspect for the death of his brother RAMGEN MAGSAYSAY BAUTISTA;
  • Accused was not given the opportunity to meet face to face with the police witness who would identify his person and his rights under the Miranda Doctrine was likewise, not performed at the time of their so called “arrest”;
  • The next day, Nov. 1, 2011 accompanied by his mother, Genelyn Magsaysay and lawyer at that time, Atty. Dennis Manzanal, RJ Bautista was brought to the Paranaque City Prosecutor’s Office for Inquest. RJ’s camp did not execute the waiver under the provisions of Article 125, as a result RJ Bautista was not subjected to Preliminary Investigation. RJ’s case was submitted for Resolution and has been passed and elevated to the Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 274.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the Joint-Affidavit of Arrest by the Paranaque Police regarding the “invitation” made to RJ Bautista last Oct. 31, 2011 at around 11:30pm.

If you are not aware on how our Justice System works here in the Philippines, here it is: Inquest or Preliminary Investigation, if probable cause found –> To the Court –> Arraignment –> Pre-Trial –> Trial –> Judgement / Promulgation.

To the Court: RTC Branch 274

As the case of RJ Bautista was elevated to the court. His former lawyer, Atty. Manzanal filed a Motion to Quash Information, as believed that he was arrested illegally and therefore detained illegally.

Motion to Quash Information

Show / Hide to DOWNLOAD Documents relating to the Motion to Quash


It states, “The sacred right against an arrest, search or seizure without valid warrant is not only ancient. It is also zealously safeguarded. The Constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches or seizures. Any evidence obtained in violation of said right shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding. Indeed, while the power to search and seize may at times be necessary to the public welfare, still it must be exercised and the law implemented without contravening the constitutional rights of the citizens, for the enforcement of no statute is of sufficient importance to justify indifference to the basic principles of government.(Valdez vs People, G.R. No. 170180, November 23, 2007)

Justifying RJ’s arrest

  • Now, in justifying the arrest of the accused, the Paranaque Police invoked the police theory of Hot Pursuit. However, this theory is belied by the fact that THEY INVITED RJ BAUTISTA FOR SOME QUESTIONING and even so, the arresting officers did not have personal knowledge of the crime allegedly committed at the residence of the accused. Neither the alleged reportee, Ruel Puzon has personal knowledge of the commission of the crime.

  • In a “Hot Pursuit Operation“, it falls under Section 5(b) of Rule 113 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure as amended.

Sec. 5. Arrest without warrant: When lawful – A peace officer or a private person may, without a warrant, arrest a person: x x x (b) When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and x x x

Going back to the Motion to Quash, it is stated that at anytime before entering his plea, the accused may move to quash the complaint or information in accordance with Section 3, Rule 117 of the Rules of Court, which provides:

Sec. 3. Grounds: The accused may move to quash the complaint or information on any of the following grounds: x x x (c) That the court trying the case has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused; x x x

In several cases, it has been recognized by the Court that the legality of an arrest affects the jurisdiction over the person of the accused. (Diamante vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 180992, September 4, 2009; Dolera vs. Philippines, G.R. No. 180693, September 4, 2009; People vs Alunday, G.R. 181546, September 3, 2008)

However, last December 16, 2011 the Court denied RJ Bautista’s Motion to Quash Information in favor of the prosecution.

Arraignment:

(Arraignment Page can be found here)

  • Nov. 16, 2011 is the original set date for the arraignment, however it was reset to Jan. 17, 2012 since there was a pending motion that needs to be resolved first.

  • On January 17, 2012, RJ Bautista, Michael Nartea, and Roy Francis Tolisora pleaded “NOT GUILTY” to charges against them.
  • On January 2012, Ryan Pastera, Glaiza Visda, and Norwin dela Cruz pleaded “NOT GUILTY” to charges against them.

Charge sheet / Information

The accusatory allegations of the ”amended criminal information” indicting all the accused for the non-bailable offense of murder are as follows:

“The undersigned Assistant City Prosecutor accuses, Ramon Joseph Bautista, Michael Jay Nartea alias “MICHAEL”, Roy Francis Tolisora alias “KIKO”, Ramona Bautista alias “MARA”, Glaiza Visda alias “GLAIZA VISTA”¸ Norwin dela Cruz alias “TOTO”, and Ryan Pastera alias “BRYAN” of the crime of murder, committed as follows:

That on or about the 28th day of October 2011, at the City of Parañaque, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above named accused, conspiring and confederating together and all of them mutually helping and aiding one another with intent to kill, did then and there willfully, and unlawfully and feloniously attack, shoot with unlicensed firearm and stab with a bladed weapon one RAMGEN JOSE BAUTISTA y MAGSAYSAY, hitting him on the different parts of the body, thereby inflicting upon him serious physical injuries which directly caused his death, the said killing having been attended by the qualifying circumstances of treachery, evident premeditation, committed in consideration of a price, reward or promise, and abuse of superior strength, and the attendant ordinary aggravating circumstances of a crime committed in a dwelling during nighttime and employment of disguise which qualify such killing to Murder.”

Pre-trial:

(Pre-trial Page can be found here)

  • March 1, 2012 is the original set date for the Pre-trial, however it was reset to March 15, 2012, due to the “pre-marking of evidence” must be set first.

  • March 15, 2012, the second set date for the Pre-trial, however it was reset again and scheduled on March 19, 2012 due to the ”absence” of State Prosecutor Quetulio.
  • March 19, 2012, Pre-trial pushed through. All pre-marked evidence ”accepted”.

Accused Petition for Bail Filed


Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the Petition for Bail that RJ Bautista filed last Jan. 11, 2012

All accused, except for Ramona Bautista, filed a Petition for Bail to ask the court for their temporary liberty since the prosecutor didn’t recommend any bail, in regards to the murder charge, for all of the accused.

It was ruled that, “As a general rule, a person in custody shall, before final conviction be entitled to bail as a matter of right.” 1 When evidence of guilt is strong, a person shall not be entitled to bail if charged with a capital offense or with an offense that under the law is punishable with reclusion perpetua at the time of its commission and at the at the time of the application for bail.

From the foregoing, it is clear that it is jurisprudentially settled that before conviction of an offense punishable by death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment, when evidence of guilt is NOT strong, ”bail becomes a matter of right”.

  • Supreme Court in Paras v. Baldado cites: “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, honor or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws”.

    RJ Bautista and other accused, through their respective lawyers filed their Petition for Bail. For RJ Bautista’s part, his petition for bail states the following grounds:

    1. ACCUSED RAMON JOSEPH M. BAUTISTA, HAD BEEN CHARGED WITH MURDER AND FRUSTRATED MURDER BASED ON HEARSAY EMMANATING FROM TESTIMONIAL HEARSAYS OF QUESTIONABLE AND/OR POLLUTED SOURCES.

    2. THE ARREST OF THE ACCUSED IS QUESTIONABLE AND BORDERING ON ILLEGALITY OF THE CONTINUED DETENTION OF THE ACCUSED IS ESSENTIALLY ARBITRARY IN CHARACTER BASED ON MISTAKEN IDENTITY ANCHORED ON MERE ALLEGATIONS OF HOT PURSUIT WITHOUT A WARRANT, AS MANDATED BY THE MOST BASIC AND PARAMOUNT LAW OF THE LAND, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES AND ITS SUPREMACY MUST BE UPHELD.
    3. PRIVATE COMPLAINANT HONORABLE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE, HAS NO DIRECT PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE INORDER FOR THEM TO QUALIFY AS PRIVATE COMPLAINANT IN THE INSTANT CASE. WHICH IS HEREBY STATED WITH ALL HUMILITY AND RESPECT TO LAWFUL AUTHORITIES TO SERVE THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.

Let us always remember, “Accusation is not synonymous with guilt. Every circumstances favoring the accused’s innocence must be taken into account. Proof against him must survive the test of reason; the stronger suspicion must not be permitted to sway judgement. The conscience must be satisfied that on the defendant could be laid the responsibility for the offense charged. What is required is moral certainty. 2

Petition for Bail Trial: Prosecution Witnesses

As for all the accused filed a Petition for Bail, the court has to hear first the Petition for Bail before it could go to the main trial. For the Prosecution for its presentation of evidence presented seven (7) witnesses with the following testimony with our comments:

  1. First witness of the prosecution is Senior Police Officer 4 (SPO4) Charlie Bayoca of the Philippine National Police.
    Show / Hide to read the Testimony of this Witness

  2. Second witness of the prosecution is Ruel Puzon y Yumang, the alleged INFORMANT, STAR witness, and the supposed REPLACEMENT GUNMAN.
    Show / Hide to read the Testimony of this Witness

  3. Third witness of the prosecution is Ronaldo Ancajas y Flores, the guard and PA of the late, Ram Revilla..
    Show / Hide to read the Testimony of this Witness

  4. Fourth witness of the prosecution is Janelle Manahan y Quintano, the former girlfriend of the late Ram Revilla, also complainant in the Frustrated Murder case.
    Show / Hide to read the Testimony of this Witness

  5. Fifth witness of the prosecution is Dr. Dominic L. Aguda, the Medico-Legal Officer of the NBI.
    Show / Hide to read the Testimony of this Witness

  6. Sixth witness of the prosecution is Sheridan Embat, the police tagged him as to “where it all started”.
    Show / Hide to read the Testimony of this Witness

  7. Seventh witness of the prosecution is Nino Tabada, the security guard of the village.
    Show / Hide to read the Testimony of this Witness

After presenting seven (7) witnesses, the Prosecution asked the Court for thirty (30) days to file their Formal Offer of Evidence.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the Prosecution’s Formal Offer of Evidence filed in Court.

Right after the Prosecution filed their Formal Offer of Evidence, the Defense replied and filed their opposition to the Offer, then the Honorable Court Ordered on June 3, 2013 directing all accused to manifest if still they intend to present evidence before the court will consider the incidents of Petitions for Bail be submitted for resolution.

At that juncture, the Defense filed a Manifestation that in lieu of presenting evidence, the Defense would just move to file a Memorandum in support for the Petitions for Bail.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download RJ Bautista’s Manifestation (Re: the Order to Present Evidence or Not) filed in Court.

Memorandum filed by the Accused

The defense filed their Memorandum (In Support for the Petitions for Bail). Below is RJ Bautista’s Memorandum in Support for his Petition for Bail. Also, download below the Manifestation filed by RJ Bautista to ask the Honorable Court to resolve the Petition for Bail due to the time given that the other accused hasn’t file their respective Memorandums.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download RJ Bautista’s Memorandum (In Support for the Petition for Bail) filed in Court.
DOWNLOAD
Click the download button on the left side to download RJ Bautista’s Manifestation (That the Court should resolve the Petition for Bail) filed in Court.

Petition for Bail submitted for Resolution

After the Court gave all the accused time to file their respective Manifestations and Memorandums, only RJ Bautista and Ryan Pastera, through counsels, was able to file their Memorandums. With that, the Court ordered the incidents of Petitions for Bail of all the accused be submitted for Resolution.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the Order (072213) – Petitions for Bail submitted for Resolution document released by the Court.

Bail Resolution & Motion for Reconsideration

If you have missed the Download option at the top most portion of this post, below are the download links for the Bail Resolution and for the Motion for Reconsideration filed by RJ Bautista.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download Order (090413) – Bail Resolution released by the court resolving the Petitions for Bail by all of the accused.
Click the download button on the left side to download the RJ Bautista’s Motion for Reconsideration document in connection with the denial to Bail.
Click the download button on the left side to download the Prosecution’s Comment (Re: the Motion for Reconsideration) document in connection with the denial to Bail.
Click the download button on the left side to download the RJ Bautista’s Reply (Re: the Prosecution’s Comment to the Motion for Reconsideration) document in connection with the denial to Bail.

Notes:

  1. People vs. Presiding Judge, RTC Muntinlupa City [Br. 276] 431 SCRA 391
  2. People v. Bania, G.R. 46524, 31 Jan. 85
  3. Sworn Statement given to the Police of Janelle Manahan
  4. http://www.philstar.com/metro/2012/10/10/857886/medico-legal-officer-details-ramgens-wounds
  5. http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/99887/another-sister-linked-to-slay
  6. People of Phils. vs RJ Bautista, et. al., March 12, 2013 at 8:30am, Transcript of Stenographical Notes (TSN): 63 pages (031213TSN)
  7. People of Phils. vs RJ Bautista, et. al., March 19, 2013 at 8:30am, Transcript of Stenographical Notes (TSN): 62 pages (031913TSN)
  8. Sworn Statement of Niño Tabada, taken last Oct. 29, 2011 by Police Officer 2 Encallado, 4 pages
  9. Sworn statement of Tabada
  10. 031213TSN
  11. 031213TSN
  12. 031213TSN
  13. Sworn statement of Tabada
  14. 031213TSN
  15. Sworn statement of Tabada
  16. 031913TSN

[Video] 2nd Death Anniversary: Still being missed, share your testimony of Ramgen! How can we find real justice?


Today, Oct. 29, 2013 will officially mark the 2nd Death Anniversary of Ramgen Jose Magsaysay Bautista also known as Ram Revilla. He died around 11:30pm on Oct. 28, 2011 and officially declared dead on arrival on the early morning of Oct. 29, 2011.

Last year, we offered our prayers for justice to be served but until now we don’t have answers to our questions. Also, family and friends released balloons saying their messages for Ramgen. (See 1st Death Anniversary details)

And yesterday, Oct. 28, 2013, we commemorated Ramgen’s 2nd Death Anniversary with our family members. Again like last year, RJ Bautista was allowed to visit for the 2nd time the grave of our beloved eldest brother and now which made it more exceptional was that our Father, Ramon Revilla, Sr. and our other half-siblings were able to attend it and remember Ramgen with us. This is also the first time that our Father and almost the whole clan was able to be reunited once again after the tragic incident. (See also: Ramon Revilla, Sr.’s Official Statement about the Ramgen Case and also check the 2nd Death Anniversary Page with pictures)

The Magsaysay’s, Bautista’s and the Revilla’s sung

With Ramon Revilla, Sr., family and the church, we sung this hymn:

  1. There was a time,
    when you feel that you are lonely.
    There was a time,
    when you feel you’re alone.
    Remember my brothers,
    that Jesus loves you so.
    A love that would change your life.

    Chorus:
    Yes, I love you,
    with the love of the Lord forever.
    I love you with all my heart.
    Yes, I love you,
    with the love of the Lord forever.
    My brothers and sisters love you so.

  2. Can you see the sunshine,
    shinning in the sky.
    Can you see the rainbow,
    reflecting on the sea?
    Remember my sisters,
    that Jesus loves you so
    a love that would change your life.
    (Repeat chorus)

We know, in this world, we are never going to be complete again, sad but we must face reality. Ramgen is with our Creator, he is in the place of comfort. And I’m sure even if we haven’t seen each other for a long period of time, I know that he is still watching us and guiding us.

Share you memories with Ram Revilla

image

Testimonial:
A tribute to a simple man with simple wishes. Who and what is Ram Revilla or simply Ramgen to you? Are you his friend? A fan? Share us your memories of him and make it part of this tribute! Send us your message and we will add your testimonial about him here.

How to send us a message? You can use the form at this page and in there you will see "Click here to submit your testimonial" below that page or you can use our "Contact Us" page or by sending us an email at admin@ramrevilla.net. Note: Negative comments will not be entertained especially if it contain libelous materials. Always be reminded of the word respect.

Mahirap mamatayan ng mahal sa buhay. At lalong mahirap kung ang mahal mo sa buhay dumanaa ng di magandang kamatayan... -- Father Ed, during Ramgen's interment.

Gallery of photos

See gallery photos at this link.

How will we have the justice that Ramgen truly deserve?

Ramgen is a Hero. If it weren't for him, Janelle Manahan and Ramona wouldn't be alive today, he died because he was able the fight and save Janelle and Ramona.

But, how? Where is the real justice? We don't know, because the police stopped doing their jobs when they were able to concoct an incredible story. However, we believe there might be a way. The only way we believe is first to find out why those witnesses lied during their testimonies and pinpointing the innocents:

  • As all of you may know, Ronald Ancajas, Ramgen's personal aide and boxing trainer. In his statements we found out that he lied. How could he not hear the noises created upstairs when the room of Ramgen is just below his room, especially when he said he "saw" RJ and Ramona walking out of the village while Janelle is asking for help. (See evidence: Video: Ocular. Proof of Ronald Ancajas lies)
  • Nino Tabada, duty security guard of the village. He said that he did not notice anything unusual, except when he saw RJ Bautista walking out of the village when he just finished roving. However, in court he admitted that he did not conduct any roving activity within the area. (Read his testimony in here)
  • How about the others? Well we believe they are just fall guys, as they admitted, who wanted to have part of the reward money before when they appeared on national television. Roy Francis Tolisora and Michael Jay Nartea, the supposed gunmen, admitted that they were just fallguys and they did not know the victim's brother, RJ Bautista. (Check this video wherein he admitted that he did not know RJ Bautista, but then during the preliminary investigation he changed his statement)

2nd Death Anniversary: Who is Ramgen?

Who is Ramgen?

wpid-RamRevillaRibbon.png

Ramgen is the first born child of a family of 9. Born with a given name of Ramgen Jose Magsaysay Bautista on Feb. 12, 1988 to Ramon “Jose A. Bautista” Revilla, Sr. and Genelyn Magsaysay.

Ramgen’s Legacy

It has been 2 years since the death of a beloved man, whose wishes were just simple. For some of you may already know, Ramgen before his death was truly a loving man and has a heart for the masses. He wanted to establish a foundation called “Agimat ng Kabataan“, wherein its main purpose is to serve the kids – to prevent the youths against illegal activities.

Agimat ng Kabataan

Ramgen with kids.

He failed to incorporate the foundation but he did not fail to serve.

Agimat ng Kabataan Logo

Agimat ng Kabataan Logo of Ram Revilla, a foundation he wanted to build.

Before his death, if I can remember correctly, that every weekend he will do a “feeding program” for malnourished children in Imus, Cavite and even a “Educational program” wherein he will distribute school supplies and will show an education TV show such as the classic “Sineskwela” and others, right after he will conduct a “quiz” for the kids and if they get it right they’ll have a prize. Even without a political office, Ramgen was able to serve even in his small little ways.

Political dreams

Ram Revilla with Gov. Remulla and Mayor Saki

Ram Revilla with Gov. Remulla and Mayor Saki

  • Last 2010, Ram Revilla wanted to run for vice-mayor of Imus, together with Mayor Saquilaian – his supposed running mate, who won the elections last 2010. For the record, Ramon Revilla, Sr. was already going to support Ramgen for his political ambition. However, due to some problems he was forced not to run anymore.
  • In 2013, Ramgen was planning to run for councilor. However, his dreams were just dreams, because to whoever killed him did not give a chance to achieve it anymore. All his dreams were brought down with him and died with him.

Interesting read: The Ramgen Revilla Case and the Court of Public Opinion


Read it as a whole, it might enlighten you. And make you realize NOT to judge immediately, since not all the reports are true and accurate. Who knows? Definitely not you, nor the police, nor the fake witnesses. But we stand #Justice4Ramgen&hisFamily

lifesomundane2

The Ramgen Revilla Case and the Court of Public Opinion

01 December 2011
ramgen

It was fascinating, the other night, as a television news anchor interviewed Janelle Manahan, erstwhile girlfriend of the slain young starlet Ramgen Revilla, about what really happened inside the room that night when the starlet was murdered. Ramona Revilla, who had flown off to Europe to avoid the controversy, was in the room with her and Ramgen, Janelle tearfully narrated.

A masked man entered the room, she went on. She was shot first. She remembered Ramgen wanting to know who the masked man was. Then, but for the sounds of a struggle, there was silence. Ramona, Janelle said, was right there beside her; and thereby contradicting everything that the former had said publicly about fleeing the scene in a daze.

And there, everyone watching probably thought, was further proof of Ramona’s guilt and involvement in the murder; if her flight to Turkey wasn’t proof enough already.

I had not really wanted to write about the Revilla murder case. It is as profound a case of sibling rivalry as a story can possibly get. That is, assuming that all the accounts of witnesses in the custody of the police are true and accurate.
ramburol
Therein, however, lays the problem. Diverse versions of the alleged truth have emerged courtesy of the media.

Investigators within the police are convinced that they are building a strong case. The witnesses, they say, are corroborating each other’s statements. But then again, one or two of these witnesses were initially in hiding; were also initially reticent about facing the media when they finally emerged; then eventually became not so timid about showing their faces or adding to the stories that they told.

One even dropped the name “Bong;” and those who will believe anything that they see on television will immediately think that the senator had something to do with the whole sorry business as well. But the more discriminating will start to smell bull where the story was erstwhile plausible.
genelyn
bongrevilla
On the other hand, Genelyn Bautista – the mother of the slain actor – was also interviewed live on a news program soon after the murder occurred. The conclusions that can be drawn from that interview are that a) she was totally clueless about the dynamics of her own family; b) she was a damned good actress; or c) she was telling the goddamned truth.

How can the truth emerge, though, if a version of it emerges each day in true soap opera fashion? It has been like a game of Trip to Jerusalem in reverse; and which member of the Bautista – or Revilla – family gets implicated next.

Which brings me back to the Janelle Manahan interview. The day after, it was reported that her lawyers had advised her not to speak to the media anymore about the case. Strange that the advice could not have been given a day sooner.

I feel for the young Janelle Manahan; and to see her speaking to the media with tears streaming down her cheeks was almost unbearable. I cringe just to imagine what it must have been like for her inside that room that fateful night.
janelle
On the other hand, her lawyers had also told the media that her initial written testimonies had been revised as memories subsequently returned to her after the trauma started to subside. Also, whatever she remembers were bits and pieces of the incident after she was shot.

It is, therefore, up to investigators to stitch together these bits and pieces; for lawyers to present and refute these in a court of law; and for a judge to decide where, amidst the cacophony of noises, the truth lies.

That is why, fascinating as Janelle Manahan’s story was as relayed to the news anchor, I regretted that the interview took place at all. Her story, that was best told in a court of law.

The immediate loser in the court of public opinion was, naturally, Ramgen’s sister Ramona. Not to mention the other siblings who have, likewise, been implicated.
sc
But what the court of public opinion often conveniently forgets is that, in a democracy, anyone accused is considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a shade of reasonable doubt. And that the trial must take place, not in a square box called the television set, but in a court of law.

It is so easy, based on what media has been showing us, to come to the conclusion that – indeed – the Ramgen case was a premeditated murder with the victim’s own siblings behind the crime. Yet, hasn’t the Vizconde massacre already shown, albeit two decades after the fact, that the obvious may not be so obvious, after all? At least, not in a court of law.

Who knows what really happened inside that room of the Revilla house that fateful night? Who really knows who were behind the crime?

If, indeed, the Revilla siblings had plotted the murder of their own brother, then this has got to rank among the most sinister and dastardly of crimes ever. On the other hand, if they are innocent, then I can just imagine all the trauma that all the negative publicity has been inflicting upon the family.
ramona
Freedom allows us the privilege of forming our own individual opinions on anything. However, freedom is not the same as fairness. Fairness dictates that we form our opinions based on facts and after the entire story has been stitched together; and not on the piecemeal being served to us each day by the media.

Media, to be fair, simply caters to the public’s insatiable hunger for information. That said, shouldn’t its practitioners already have learned from the Rizal Park fiasco involving the Hong Kong nationals that discretion is probably more to the public’s interest?

Janelle Manahan, we were shown, was taken to a police safe house. How safe can that safe house be when footages of the vehicle she was in was broacast over national television? Not to say that imminent danger to her life is untrue; but the real danger is to the truth coming out at all because the case is already being tried publicly.

Admirably, it has been the police which has been most discreet in what it says to the media. Just as well. The last thing we all want is to start being swayed into thinking one way only to find out years later that the courts think otherwise. No apologies can ever compensate for the trauma and stigma inflicted upon the accused; particularly if they are truly innocent as distinct from simply being found not guilty by a court of law.

The most regrettable thing about all these is that – after all is said and done – only one of the Revillas has really been charged with anything as yet. It will serve everyone’s interests if we all reserve judgement until after all the cards have been laid out on the deck. source

[Video] Last video taken by Ram Revilla

Ram Revilla last video taken before his death

Ram Revilla was happy and smiling hours before he was killed. It was Ram Revilla’s last video, taken a few hours before he was killed in their house in Parañaque. The video was a greeting for his brother who had been accepted at the Philippine Military Academy (PMA). Little did anyone know at the time that the happy greeting would be replaced by sadness for the whole family hours later.

Ram Revilla was killed in his bedroom by two assailants. His girlfriend, Janelle Manahan, was injured and was only recently told of his death as she recuperates at the Asian Hospital. Meanwhile, Revilla’s family is in turmoil as two of his siblings are being implicated in his death.

Also included in the video is the statement of Ram’s mother, the former Genelyn Magsaysay. She told the media that Ram was a good son and a good brother who acted as his siblings’ father. He loved his siblings and they loved him in return. Genelyn Magsaysay says that her children would not do anything to harm their kuya. (GMA News)

Welcome to http://ramrevilla.net!


Welcome to the Ram Revilla tribute website!

Browse through the website to find interesting reads about Ram Revilla, read his biography or check out Ramgen’s gallery.

A tribute website: A tribute to a simple man with simple wishes. Who and what is Ram Revilla or simply Ramgen to you? Are you his friend? A fan? Share us your memories of him and make it part of this tribute! Send us your message and we will add your testimonial about him here.

Or if you’re here to get some updates about the Ram Revilla Murder Case, you came to the right place! Below you can browse:

  • Are you looking for the details of the murder case? Read here.

  • Or are you looking for timeline of events of the case? Read here.
  • Or are you interested about the Prosecution Witnesses and hear some of their lies? Read here.
  • Or maybe, why we believe RJ and Ramona Bautista are innocent? Read here.
  • Want to contact us? Click here.

interesting reads about Ram Revilla,

2nd Witness: Ruel Puzon (Star witness)

Star Witness Ruel Puzon’s testimony compared to his statements.

TESTIMONY IN COURT

Testimony date: June 5, 19, July 17, 24, and Sept. 18, 2012

The second witness was Ruel Puzon y Yumang. The witness testified that at-around 6:00 o’clock in the moming of October 12, 2011, he was at their house located at 6225 Poultry Compound, San Dionisio, Parañaque city; He was awakened by his mother because of persons, namely; Michael Nartea, Norwin Dela Cruz, Glaiza Visda, and a certain Bryan or Ryan who were calling for him.

Before October 12, he already knew Michael Nartea for quite a long time, but they were never together. They are neighbors and Michael is known as “namamaril” and engaged in hold-up. He knows Glaiza Visda for about a year with Norwin Dela Cruz. Both were introduced to him by a certain Lloyd Komeda @Lim. He came to know accused Bryan or Ryan Pastera only on October 12 when the group went to his house. The group talked about the replacement of Kiko (pagpalit kay Kiko).

Kiko is Roy Tolisora. The conversation was about the failed “pagpasok sa bahay ni Ramgen” as told to him by the group. They were then inside the Vios car of Glaiza Visda which she also drove. In the front passenger seat was Ryan, while at the back were Michael Nartea, Norwin Dela Cruz, and himself sitting in the middle. It was actually Norwin and Glaiza who told him about the failed plan to kill Ramgen in the early morning of October 12.

It was Michael who told him to replace Kiko in killing Ramgen. At that time, he was not yet sure to accept the offer. They then proceeded to the house of Kiko at Kabihasnan, Parañaque City.

Glaiza alighted from the car to see Kiko inside his house. Glaiza returned to the car with Kiko, qand then Ryan told Kiko that they were getting the two (2) guns. Kiko went back to the house and when he returned, handed the .45 gun to Ryan as the other gun he pawned. (Note: According to his Sworn Statement, he handed the gun to Norwin dela Cruz.)

They then went home. On the same date. October 12, 2011. Ryan gave Puzon a picture of Ramgen. (TSN of June 5, 2012. PP- 56-71)

On October 14, 2011 at around 1:00 o’clock in the afternoon together with Michael Nartea, he again met Ryan Pastera at C-5 Golden Haven, Las Pinas City to get the Php19,000.00 redemption money for a gun. Ryan arrived at around 1:25 pm. They went inside the car, an Innova, and while Ryan gave the Php19,000.00 to Michael. Ryan had then a companion whom the witness did not yet know. Later, he came to know the person as Ramon Joseph Baunsta through some pictures and a photocopy of a driver’s license the police showed him. Michael then gave the money to Puzon for the latter to redeem another gun as what Puzon made them to believe. The witness recognized Ramon Joseph who was seated in front beside Ryan because Ramon Joseph looked back at him and Michael who were seated at the back of the car.

On October 17, 2011, he met with Ryan at 7-Eleven at Pulanglupa, Las Pinas City at around 3:00 o‘clock in the morning as told by Ryan through cellphone. The message was made in the afternoon of October 16 and they met early in the next morning. Ryan is to point to him the house of Ramgen, the subject of the killing. They then went to BF Homes, Parañaque City, passing by Norwin Dela Cruz who also live in BF Homes, and who also went with them at that time (Note: According to his Sworn Statement, they went to the house with Michael and Bryan, not Norwin). Reaching the place of Ramgen, they looked at the garage and they passage at the back. They were riding an Innova. They alighted (Note: According to his Sworn Statement, they never alighted from the car, they were just roaming around and never went down) and Ryan pointed to him the passage into the house of Ramgen at the back. It was Ryan telling him the route to get inside. They stayed at the place for about 15 minutes. Puzon overheard Ryan talking with somebody through a cellphone he heard Ryan mentioning the name Joseph. Ryan was talking in that cellphone conversation with Joseph about the plate number of the car being used by Ramgen. Ryan then told Puzon about the plate number of the car of Ramgen, but the plate number was erased in his own cellphone.

At this time, Puzon did not yet agree to do the job of Kiko. He was just riding on with the plan with the intention to just take the money of Ryan. By 4:00 o’clock in the morning of October 17, they left BF Homes for home.

After October 17, they met again on October 19, 2011 at 7 Eleven Sucat. Ramgen was not yet dead at that time. Present then were Ryan Pastera, Norwin Dela Cruz. Glaiza Visda, and Michael Nartea. He and Michael arrived at around 9:00 o’clock in the evening riding in a motorbike. The meeting was about the planning to ambush Ramgen. There was no designated gunman yet at that time. The group went ahead towards BF Homes. Puzon and Michael were to follow in a motorbike. However. the two did not follow as planned, intending to give the excuse later that they were caught by the police for traffic violation. He and Michael went home instead. Later, he watched on TV that Ramgen Revilla was killed. He then went to the police headquarters and gave his statement on October 30, 2011 (Note: PROOF that Ruel Puzon DID NOT voluntarily surrender at police headquarters). (see TSN of June 5, 2012, pp. 11-96; TSN of June 19, 2012, pp. 9-113; TSN of July 17, 2012, pp. 6-119; TSN of July 24, 2012, pp. 9-103; TSN of September 18, 2012, pp. 7-19; TSN of November 20, 2012, pp. 6-12)

CROSS EXAMINATION with comparison with the discrepancies to the exisiting Sworn Statement of the witness:

Page 55, TSN June 19, 2012

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: In your Sinumpaang Salaysay dated October 30, 2011, in question no. 13 you were asked, “Matapos nito mayroon pa bang sumunod na pangyayari, kung mayroon man? And you answered “Mayroon po, noong 17 October 2011, bandang 3:00 ng hapon isinama ako ni Michael at Bryan sa lugar nila Ramgen sa BF Parañaque”. Do you confirm that?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

Atty. Diaz-Salccdo:
Q: So, this is not true?

Wimcss R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: What you stated in your salaysay dated October 30 is not true, Mr. Witness? Because here, you stated that it was Michael and Bryan who were with you. Now in your testimony on page 55 or earlier, you just stated that it was Norwin and Bryan who were with you.

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Opo.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedoz:
Q: So who were with you?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Norwin and Bryan po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: So, this is not true, in your statement dated October 30 which you earlier said to have contained all the true information that you knew about the incident? You were not telling the truth when you executed this affidavit, Mr. Witness?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Mali po. Opo.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: You were lying?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Mali po ‘yong nasabi ko?

Page 68, TSN, June 19, 2012

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: Going back to your statement dated October 30, 2011, Mr. Witness. Were you able to enter the house of Ramgen, Mr. Witness?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: You just stayed outside?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Opo.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: Outside of the vehicle?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Sa labas po ng gate.

xxx. xxx xxx.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: So, you alighted from the vehicle but you just stayed outside of the house, at the gate, is that correct?

Wimess R. Puzon:
A: Opo.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: In your statement dated October 30, 2011, in question no. 14 you were asked, “Nakapasok ba kayo sa loob ng bahay ni Ramgen”, sagot: Hindi sir, sa labas lang. Doon kami sa Innova ni Bryan at inikutan lang naming ang bahay at nasabing lugar”. Do you confirm that statement?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Opo.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q. You did not state here that you alighted from the vehicle and then proceeded to the gate of Ramgen’s house? Hindi mo sinabi?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: So, what is the truth Mr. Witness, did you alight from the vehicle?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Bumaba po kami.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: So, your answer in question no. 14 of your Sinumpaang Salaysay dated October 30 that you stayed inside the Innova is not true?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

xxx xxx xxx.

TSN, page 97, June 19, 2012.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: Do you know the publicized reward of Five Hundred Thousand Pesos (Php. Php500,000.00) for whoever who can provide information or lead on the persons who are responsible to the death of Ramgen Revilla? Have you ever heard about that. Mr. Witness, the Five Hundred Thousand (Php.500,000.00) reward?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

Atty. Diaz-SaIcedo:
Q: You never heard about that?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: So you have no idea that there was a reward Five Hundred Thousand (Php500,000.00)?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Wala po.

Atty. Diaz-Salccdo:
Q: Until now, Mr. Witness?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Alam po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: Were you given any part of that reward Mr. Witness?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Opo.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: How much?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Nong bago lang po mag pasko.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: How much Mr. Witness?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Fifteen lang po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: Fifteen thousand (Php15,000.00)?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Opo, 15.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: Who gave you, Mr. Witness, the fifteen thousand?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Sila hepe po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: What’s the name of the hepe?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Beltran po.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: Why did he give you Fifteen Thousand Pesos?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Kumbaga pamasko lang daw po. 1

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: As a Christmas gift?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Opo.

Atty. Diaz-Salcedo:
Q: It’s not part of the reward?

Witness R. Puzon:
A: Hindi po.

Xxx xxx xxX

And finally, on Oct. 19, 2011, this was the last meeting with Puzon wherein they will execute the plan to kill Ramgen, however he backed out, out of the blue without telling the group. He further testified that after this alleged meeting, the said group ”never” contacted him ever again.

When the judge find some of what he is saying hard to believe he asked the witness, “Sa palagay mo, Ruel, hindi naman kaya gawa gawa mo lang itong mga sinasabi mo?” 2(TSN, page 112, June 19, 2012)

SWORN STATEMENTS

Ruel Puzon executed three (3) Sinumpaang Salaysay which are dated October 30, 2011, November 1, 2011, and November 17, 2011.

Analysis

Ruel Puzon, the star witness of the prosecution, revealed a lot of allegations regarding the death of Ram Revilla. However, said fact that he does not have any personal knowledge as to what transpired on the evening of Oct. 28, 2011, assuming it to be true, just the failed attempts to murder Ram Revilla. 3

However, after his giving his testimonies and statements it somehow revealed to have a lot inconsistencies.

As even pointed by him on his testimony of having huge discrepancies on his sworn statement and testimony in court.

Ruel Puzon tried to pin RJ Bautista being the financier of the deal being in the car on the alleged “Oct. 14, 2011” meeting, this statement is just based on conjectures, surmises, and speculation, he admitted, assuming it to be true, that the person sitted in front was not doing anything and was just sitting therein.

He was not there at the crime scene at the time of its commitment, given that he is not a witness. He did not see who shot Ram Revilla or wounded Janelle Manahan.

His statement did not prove anything that RJ Bautista or the other accused really participated in the well-written script that this witness is saying, the only thing that his statements and testimony proved is that he is a LIAR.

And by in large, clearly appears on his testimony not only bordered on perjury but even more his acts speaks for itself to have dwelled in the realm of fallacious statements at the expense of justice and of the accused.

The numerous odd inconsistencies are so vital for the witness to answer but he resorted to of switching personas in his testimony.

As stated, the court asked the witness for its clarificatory questions, and in query asked if the group ever contacted him again after the last Oct. 19, 2011 meeting? He said “No.” Meaning, after all the alleged purported meetings and giving him money as he was the replacement gunman, according to him, he was never contacted again and nothing at all transpired.

Notes:

  1. http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/230484/ramgen-witness-%E2%80%98in-it-for-the-money%E2%80%99
  2. http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/215561/genelyn-says-‘hallelujah’-as-judge-asks-witness-are-you-lying
  3. http://www.tempo.com.ph/2012/06/ramgen-case-4

3rd Witness: Ronald Ancajas

Witness Ronald Ancajas’s testimony compared to his statements.

TESTIMONY IN COURT

Testimony date: September 4, 2012

The third witness is Ronaldo Ancajas (Ronald). He testified, that he is the assistant of Ramgen Bautista starting 2007. When there are no film shootings for Ramgen, he takes leave as personal assistant. He returned in 2009 for six months. He then went back as personal assistant of Ramgen when the latter called him up in July 2011. On the night of October 28, 2011, he was at the lanai at the house located at Phase 6-A, President Avenue, BF  Homes, Parañaque City together with Janelle and Ramgen. Ramgen was then doing shadow boxing. He left first at about 10:00 o’clock in the evening because he was not feeling well. He proceeded to the driver’s quarters and slept.

He woke up at around 11:00 o’clock in the evening of the same day, he was about to spit out at the quarter’s window near where he slept when he noticed “Sir Joseph” (referring to accused Ramon Joseph Bautista) walking going out of the gate of the garage at the back of the house and below the quarter (Note: According to his Sworn Statement, he said he saw them leaving the subdivision and not of the garage gate). Joseph is the brother of Ramgen. Joseph was followed by Mara (Ramona) Bautista who is also a sibling of Ramgen. He saw the two from the window when he was about to spit. The garage below was well lit. He did not mind the incident. He then went back to sleep.

At about 12:30 o’clock, he was awakened by the knocking of the policemen. When he went down, he was handcuffed and was taken to the police headquarters for investigation. He was asked if Ramgen had enemies. He answered in the negative. He knows that the siblings had feuds. The latest feud started because of the Strada car Joseph sold. When he was taken by the policemen, he does not know that Janelle was also hurt. When he saw Joseph went out of the garage, Joseph was wearing a dark colored pants maybe colored navy blue or black. He was also wearing a jacket.

During investigation at the police station, he learned through the television that Mara was abducted. He was not offered the reward money, but he was given P40,000.00 and another P10,000.00. Nothing was mentioned to him by Ramgen about the threat to his (Ramgen’s) life. He is not under police protection. (See TSN of September 4, 2012, pp. 9-125)

CROSS EXAMINATION with comparison with the discrepancies to the exisiting Sworn Statement of the witness:

Ronald Ancajas mentioned in his testimony and statement that he did NOT hear anything at all and did not notice anything unusual that night, except the alleged sightings of the siblings of the victim.

Let’s analyze it, Ancajas was awake obviously when he allegedly “saw” RJ and Ramona Bautista, when he was ‘about to spit’, assuming it to be true, he did not hear the shouting of Janelle asking for help.

However, according to Security Guard Tabada, when they came with the police they heard a voice of a female asking for help at the garage – the garage is below Ramgen’s room and at the above portion of the garage is the living quarters of Ronald Ancajas.

At the time of the crime happened even the maid of the Bautista’s heard a female voice shouting, but Ancajas did not, when in fact the room of the maids and his are just beside each other – maybe Ancajas is playing a deaf ear or he is the assailant.

SO WE ASSUME THAT HE REALLY DID NOT HEAR ANYTHING that he was really sleeping… Let’s explain the supposed “seeing the siblings going out of the village”.

It was revealed during the “Ocular Inspection” last April 17, 2012 that it is physically impossible to see from his room people walking towards the village’s gate at the distance of 15 fathom (dipa) from his place as the view is blocked by two houses and the curve.

image

This photo proves the lies of Ronald Ancajas about his statement that he saw RJ and Ramona Bautista leaving the subdivision's gate.

Video above: Explanation Photo above: Explanation
Please watch the above video containing the "Ocular inspection" of the court held last April 17.

In the video at 1:31, it will show that the siblings of Ramgen is insisting that from the view of Ronald Ancajas' room from the farthest left corner (POV: Facing the house), while the private prosecutor Atty. Argee Guevarra is insisting that Ancajas saw RJ Bautista going out of the garages' gate and not on the subdivision's.

Better yet, he should be the witness... It is crystal clear from the words of Ronald Ancajas himself that he saw RJ and Ramona going OUT of the SUBDIVISION and not of the GARAGE. He's putting and manipulating the words of Ancajas to build their fake case.

Read Ancajas' Oct. 29, 2011 statement and download it below.

The photo above is a bird's eye view of the vicinity of the house of the Bautista's. This is to show people the proof that we are not lying when we said it is impossible for Ancajas to see. Look at the picture and judge it. That bird's eye view shot came from google maps.

According to his statement below, the guard house or subdivision exit is 18 dipa (fathom) or 108 feet away while RJ Bautista is 15 dipa (fathom) or 90 feet away from him, on his sworn statement he never mentioned he saw them exiting the garage. There are two (2) houses blocking his view, not to mention the wall from the garage blocking his view from his small window. Now, is he telling the truth? You judge.

image

This is another image that will prove our claim. This is showing the rooms of Ramgen, Ancajas, and the household helpers.

  • The red square is Ramgen's room.

  • The blue arrow is pointing to the window (behind the wall) where Ronald Ancajas supposedly saw the siblings.
  • The green circle is Ancajas' window just beside the household helper's room. (First window is Ancajas')

EXPLANATION: This is the house of the Magsaysay-Bautista's at BF Homes where the tragic incident happened. the red square is Ramgen's room, obviously that image shows that the room of Ramgen is directly below the garage.

On that garage, there are rooms above it wherein it is the sleeping quarters for the drivers and Ancajas, and beside them are the household helper's room. That night only Ancajas was there at his room.

The green circle is the exact window where Ronald Ancajas resides, as you can also notice from the photo there is a wall or a boulder from the garage blocking the view of Ancajas as we also show through the blue arrow pointing to the wall/boulder blocking the view of the window. From that point on it is PHYSICALLY impossible for him to see the guard house as we showed on the map above.

Statement of Ronald Ancajas

On Oct. 29, 2011, police took Ronaldo Ancajas' statement, he is the Personal Assistant of Ramgen who knows Ramgen's schedule, the keeper of the guns of Ramgen, and has access to the house.

Ancajas Sworn Statement
Ronald Ancajas' sworn statement taken last Oct. 29, 2011 by SPO4 Odeo P. Carino. (Consists of 3 pages)

On the 2nd page of the three (3) pages statement: It says,

  1. First question.
    • Q: Ano pang sumunod na pangyayari, kung meron man?
    • A: Nakaidlip ako dahil sa pagod at puyat at mga ilang minuto... nagising ako at pagsilip ko sa bintana ng kuwarto ay nakita ko si Joseph na naglalakad palabas ng gate ng subdivision at mga ilan minuto si Mara (Ramona Bautista), akala ko papunta na sila ng Baguio.. Dahil aalis nga sila papuntang Baguio. At napa dura ako sa labas ng bintana at bumalik ako sa higaan ko at natulog.
  2. 3rd question.
    • Q: Gaano ang layo ni Mara ng sinundan niya si Joseph...(not clear copy) ang gate ng subdivision na naglalakad?
    • A: Humigit kumulang 8 dipa.
  3. 5th question.
    • Q: Gaano ang layo mo sa kinalalagyan mo mula doon sa nakitaan mo kina Joseph at Mara?
    • A: Humigit kumulang 15 dipa. (15 fathoms = 90 feet)
  4. 6th question.
    • Q: Gaano naman kalayo ang bahay ng mga Bautista sa gate ng subdivision?
    • A: Humigit kumulang sa 18 dipa. (18 fathoms = 108 feet)

Sworn statement vs video
Comparing the sworn statement of Ancajas and basing what the lawyer of the prosecution is saying, it clearly states that Ancajas never saw RJ Bautista. It is crystal clear, it only means Ronald Ancajas perjured himself when he said he saw RJ Bautista around 90 feet away going out of the subdivision gate around 108 feet away.

Download File: File Description:
Click the download button on the left side to download the Sworn Statement of Ronald Ancajas (102911) filed in court. This will show the statement we added above.

Analysis

Finally, what has been proven is that Niño Tabada and Ronald Ancajas in both of their statements and testimonies, that they LIED and PERJURED themselves especially in a delicate situation wherein they both corroborated on unfounded and malicious accusations against the siblings of the victim.